Liberals,
NDP and Bloc gang up to defeat Breitkreuz’s motion to review the laws
protecting unborn children.
Ottawa
– Garry
Breitkreuz, MP for Yorkton-Melville, is much dismayed following the defeat of
his most recent motion to have the Standing Committee on Justice and Human
Rights study the adequacy of legal protection for unborn children. “My heart is heavy this morning.
It’s surely a blow for democracy to have the wishes of my constituents
dashed like this on the floor of the House of Commons, but what I’m most sad
about is that more than 100,000 babies will die this year without even the
tiniest amount of concern from this Liberal government,” lamented Breitkreuz.
“It’s a sad, sad day when a government is so afraid of the truth
that they would stifle a full and open debate of this issue in an attempt to
hide their complete and utter disregard for human life.
Well, I won’t let them get away with it,” said the determined
Saskatchewan MP.
“Last
summer, an independent survey revealed that 75 percent of my constituents
thought the law should be amended so that the definition of a human being
includes unborn children,” reported Breitkreuz. “I introduced motion M-392 as a direct result of this
strong message from my constituents. Since
my motion was selected in the Private Member’s Business lottery just one month
ago, I have received literally thousands of letters, e-mails and faxes from
citizens telling me what they thought about the substance of my Motion.
We are receiving hundreds of responses each day.
So far we have only had time to tabulate the results from 3,511
responses. 3,450 respondents or 98%
said they are not satisfied with the current definition of a human being in the Criminal
Code,” Breitkreuz told the House. Paul
Macklin, speaking on behalf of the Liberal government, responded: “We have
reached a delicate balance in Canada. The
majority of Canadians are satisfied.” Breitkreuz
commented, “The government says that the majority of Canadians want a law
protecting two-week-old embryos but not a law protecting a healthy 8-month-old
baby living inside a healthy mother’s womb.
I wonder if they can produce the polls that are telling them that?”
Breitkreuz
used the twenty minutes he had to provide several examples of the complete moral
incoherence of the government when it comes to defending the rights of unborn
children. The most glaring came
from Health Minister, Anne McLellan. Here
is an excerpt from Breitkreuz’s speech:
On
May 10th the National Post reported that the Health Minister had this to say
about the fate of so-called “surplus embryos” at Canadian fertility clinics.
‘Do you know what happens to them?’ she asked reporters.
‘They go in the garbage. So
the donor can choose to have them thrown out, which is quite clearly their
right, or they can also choose to let those surplus embryos be used for the
purposes of medical research,’ she said.”
Talk about a slippery slope. What
does the Minister think happens to the more than 100,000 aborted fetuses every
year? That’s right Madam Minister
– they are thrown in the garbage! Most
Canadians believe it’s time to end this “moral incoherence”. In fact, it’s 14 years overdue.
It’s time to have a House of Commons’ Committee review the current
definition of a human being and that’s all my motion is asking.
Despite
all the evidence presented during the one hour of debate and support from three
other MPs: Larry Spencer, Jason Kenney and Paul Szabo, Breitkreuz’s motion was
refused the unanimous consent necessary to extend the debate by a jeering click
of Liberal, NDP and Bloc Members of Parliament.
The PC’s couldn’t even be bothered to show up for the debate.
“The debate is not over as the government claims because the status quo
is simply unacceptable. I will find other ways and means to bring the issue back to
the floor of the House of Commons,” vowed Breitkreuz.
-30-