RELEASE OF DOCUMENTS

September 26, 2001                                                                                              For Immediate Release

GUN REGISTRY EMPLOYS 1800 AND HAS ALREADY WASTED HALF A BILLION DOLLARS

Breitkreuz raises concerns with Auditor General of Canada before another half billion is wasted.

Ottawa:  Today, Garry Breitkreuz, MP for Yorkton-Melville, released a package that included the following information:

(1) A response to an Access to Information request from the Department of Justice with a spreadsheet outlining the net expenditures of more that $487 million for the Canadian Firearms Program from 1995 to 2001.

(2) A letter to the Auditor General asking for her to investigate the discrepancy between the Dept. of Justice spreadsheet and expenditures made public in the Supplementary Estimates and Governor General Special Warrants.

(3) A letter to the Auditor General asking her to investigate discoveries made by the Information Commissioner regarding the manner in which spending on the firearms program are allocated by Treasury Board.

(4) A response to an Access to Information request from the Department of Justice showing staffing levels of 1800 employees working on the firearms program.

ATI RESPONSE # 1 - Department of Justice Access to Information Request File: A-2001-0138/et - Dated: August 30, 2001: CANADIAN FIREARMS PROGRAM - NET EXPENDITURES BY FISCAL YEAR

1995-96 TO 2000-2001 = $487,185,570 

NOTE: See attached spreadsheet for details.

CONCERNS RAISED WITH AUDITOR GENERAL OF CANADA BY GARRY BREITKREUZ, MP

FIRST LETTER TO AUDITOR GENERAL - Reference is being made to your letter dated August 28, 2001.  Please find attached the most recent spreadsheet received from the Department of Justice in response to one of my Access to Information Requests (ATIP File: A01-0138/ok). This final spreadsheet identifies Total Spending on the Canadian Firearms Program for 2000/01 of $200,394,023 less revenues of $34,969,459 for Total Net Expenditures of $165,424,564.

These total expenditure figures are very confusing because they do not fully account for the $206,281,919 allocated to the Canadian Firearms Program in 2000/01 in the Governor General Special Warrants and in the Supplementary Estimates (A) and (B).  See notes below for additional details:

(1) STATEMENT ON GOVERNOR GENERAL SPECIAL WARRANTS - For the Fiscal Year Ending, March 31, 2001 - Firearms Control Program = $96,148,000 [Page 72] 

Note: Released by the Government on February 2, 2001

(2) SUPPLEMENTARY ESTIMATES (A), 2000-2001 - For the Fiscal Year Ending, March 31, 2001- Firearms Control Program TOTAL: = $49,831,000 [Page 114]

Note: Released by the Government on March 1, 2001

(3) TREASURY BOARD RESPONSE TO ATI REQUEST 2000-0304-A-LM – Department of Justice Summary – SUPPLEMENTARY ESTIMATES “B” – Firearms – Including Transfer from NPB = $60,302,919

Note: Access to Information response dated May 25, 2001.

Could it be that some of the money allocated to the firearms program was actually spent by other departments as you alluded to in your June 1st letter?  In your efforts to ensure parliamentarians receive adequate information on the cost of the registration process, would it be possible for you to get an explanation of the discrepancy between the funds allocated in these public documents and the total expenditures reported for the year 2000-2001?  It would also be very helpful for Parliamentarians to know what the original budget allocation was for the Canadian Firearms Program in 2000-2001. 

SECOND LETTER TO AUDITOR GENERAL - Reference is being made to your letter dated August 28, 2001.  Please find attached a copy of a letter we have received from Mr. John Reid, Information Commissioner of Canada dated August 29, 2001.  During his investigation of our complaint, Mr. Reid uncovered some disturbing facts regarding the funding of the Canadian Firearms Program by the Department of Justice:

(1) That there was “no proposed budget allocation has ever been produced” for the program for fiscal year 2000-2001

(2) That “a fixed amount every year” was budgeted for the program based on a determination that was made “prior to the establishment of the CFC in 1998.”

(3) That “When additional funding is required a supplementary TB submission is generated, sometimes as early as June or July of a given year.”

Is this any way to run a government program?  How can Parliamentarians, the media or the public know what is going on if this is the way the Department of Justice “manages” public monies?  Thanks again for agreeing to get to the bottom of this mess.

ATI RESPONSE #2 - Department of Justice Access to Information Request File: A-2001-0130 / ms - Dated: August 20, 2001

ADVICE TO THE MINISTER - 2001-04-12

STAFFING LEVELS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FIREARMS PROGRAM

 

-30-

Please see the accompanying spreadsheet on the expenditures of the CFC.