FIREARMS FACTS - UPDATE

RCMP NOW HAVE 4,156,497 ACTIVE FILES IN THEIR

FIREARMS INTEREST POLICE (FIP) DATABASE

 

ARE THERE REALLY THAT MANY

“POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS” CANADIANS?

 

BREITKREUZ’S ORIGINAL REQUEST DATED MARCH 29, 2004

 

Please provide copies of the reports showing the current status, cost and effectiveness of the Firearms Interest Police (FIP) database.  We are particularly interested in copies of reports documenting:

(1)   Total number of records/occurrences/additions/deletions reported by each province and territory since the inception of the FIP;

(2)   Total number of active files or current records pertaining to individuals in the FIP database; and

(3)   Efforts that have been made to bring all records in the FIP in compliance with the recommendations of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.

 

 

ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE RESPONSE DATED JUNE 11, 2004

 

Based on the information provided, a search for records was conducted in Ottawa, Ontario.  The answer to your queries is as follows:

1)      As per discussion with our office on or about May 5, 2004 you have chosen to abandon this portion of your request.

2)      We have been informed that the answer to this query is 4,156,497 as of Saturday May 1, 2004.

3)      Copies of the responsive information is enclosed. [See e-mail below]

 

E-MAIL FROM CAP. PIERRE PICHÉ, CPL., POLICY ANALYST, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS POLICY SECTION TO BOB FORD, MANAGER OF OPERATIONS AND PUBLIC AGENCY SUPPORT, CANADIAN FIREARMS CENTRE DATED MAY 1, 2003

 

Hi Bob, Rob,

In response to your earlier request, hopefully, the following information will be useful to you.  On the technical side of PIRS, more specifically the Firearms Interest Police (FIP) functionality, no significant modifications have been performed, as the PIRS to CPIC/FIP extraction criteria is an automated interface which functions flawlessly.  However, it does require sound data in order to be “perfect”.  Although the RCMP is committed to ensuring a high level of data quality, there remains room for improvement on the quality of information being inputted into PIRS [Police Information Retrieval System].

There has been a shift of accountability in the last few years in order to increase the quality and accuracy of data being submitted to PIRS.  This move was initiated in 1998, previous to the Auditor General and Privacy Commissioner’s concerns of late, regarding the FIP database.

In the past four years, a number of measures have been implemented and are ongoing.  This include:

-         A validation and disclosure process;

-         System level edits to trap data quality errors that have FIP implications;

-         Promoting awareness through user workshops and new member training;

-         Developing expertise to ensure proper data entry into RCMP systems;

-         Data quality reviews to monitor progress and compliance;

-         Holding contributors accountable for data quality.

The above initiatives have been implemented by CCAPS and are supported by RCMP senior management.  A proactive approach has been taken and positive outcomes are being seen.

 

CANADIAN FIREARMS CENTRE

Special Bulletin for Police No. 26 - Firearms Interest Police (FIP)

What is FIP and how does it work?

http://www.cfc-ccaf.gc.ca/en/owners_users/bulletins/special/police/bulletin26.asp

 

REVELATIONS IN THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER’S REPORT

By Garry Breitkreuz, MP – September 24, 2001

http://www.cssa-cila.org/garryb/publications/privacycommishrelev.htm

 

 

AUDITOR GENERAL’S REPORT – DECEMBER 2002 – CHAPTER 11

http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20021211ce.html

 

Royal Canadian Mounted Police—Canadian Firearms Program

Information to screen applicants for firearms licences may not be accurate

 

In brief

As part of the Department of Justice's Canadian Firearms Program, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) operates a database of about four million records called the Firearms Interest Police. Chief Firearms Officers use this database to help screen applicants for firearms licences. The RCMP provides about 1 million of these records. The RCMP told us that while it believes that the database has significantly improved public safety, it remains concerned about the reliability of the information it provides to the database. This matter came to our attention as part of our follow-up to our study of challenges to the criminal justice system, reported to Parliament in our April 2002 Report, Chapter 4.

 

Background

11.28 The Department of Justice's Canadian Firearms Program requires that the Chief Firearms Officers screen applicants for firearms licences in order to help ensure public safety. The Officers use the Firearms Interest Police database to help screen applicants.

 

11.29 The RCMP indicates that over 900 police agencies contribute information to the database. It contains information on individuals who have had contact with the police, including those that have been charged with an offence. The RCMP provides about 1 million of the records in the database. These records are extracted from the RCMP's Police Information Retrieval System database. The RCMP reviewed the quality of the records it provides. The data supplied by other police agencies were not reviewed.

 

Issues

11.30 In November 1998 and March 2000, the Senior Executive Committee of the RCMP was informed that officers responsible for the RCMP's contributions to the Firearms Interest Police database had serious concerns about the accuracy and completeness of the information. We reviewed RCMP files and made other inquiries to confirm the significance of these concerns.

 

11.31 An April 2001 RCMP review of data quality stated that persons are known to be in the database who should not be, and thus could be denied firearms licences or have their eligibility reviewed; and

some persons who should be in the database are not and these individuals could be issued licences and subsequently use firearms to commit a violent offence. The review concluded that a tragic incident could arise as a consequence of the poor data quality and that the RCMP therefore faces serious legal risks.

 

11.32 In 2002, the RCMP further indicated that the quality of the data was still questionable.

 

Conclusion and recommendation

11.33 The RCMP's concerns about the data are based on the limited reviews it has conducted. If what these RCMP reviews show is representative of the risks that the database presents, then remedial action must be taken immediately. However, to be effective, such action must be based on an urgent systematic identification of the problems in the database and potential solutions.

 

Royal Canadian Mounted Police's response. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) is aware of the concerns about the quality of some data in its Police Information Retrieval System and its impact on the Canadian Firearms Program. The RCMP considers public safety to be paramount. For this reason, the RCMP is committed to ensuring that individuals who do not meet the legal requirements to be issued a firearms licence are identified through proper information sharing.

 

The RCMP recognizes that effective information sharing for the purposes of the Canadian Firearms Program is critical, and that this is dependent on the integrity of the data contained in police information systems, including those of the RCMP. The RCMP has implemented a number of remedial measures to address data quality issues. These include a record disclosure and verification process, system-level error detection and reporting mechanisms, enhanced system user awareness regarding data quality issues, development of additional data quality reviewer expertise, progress and compliance monitoring, and an increased level of accountability on the part of contributors to RCMP systems for their data quality.

 

The RCMP opens 2.9 million operational case records per year, from over 750 locations throughout Canada. The measures specified to address data quality in the RCMP's Police Information Retrieval System are already proving to be effective.

 

Audit team

Assistant Auditor General: Hugh McRoberts

Principal: Alan Gilmore

Director: Ted Bonder

 

For information, please contact Communications at (613) 995-3708 or 1-888-761-5953 (toll-free).